Sexual Strategies For Men: Provisional Sexual Coercion (PSC)

What is Provisional Sexual Coercion (PSC)?

Provisional Sexual Coercion (PSC) is a procreative condition where procreation occurs between a man and woman for an exchange of resources.

What is a summary of a sexual strategy which optimizes for provisional sexual coercion?

  1. The objective of a sexual strategy which optimizes for PSC is to maximize procreative value from procreative contract(s) which involve procreation.
    1. You must exist in a provisionally-sexual coercive environment which recognizes, enforces, and assigns consequences to the breach of procreative contracts.
    2. You must execute and perform these consentual procreative contracts (with women).
  2. The ideal environment of a sexual strategy which optimizes for PSC is a psc environment which requires women to use procreative contracts for survival.
    1. Environments which let the women survive without procreative contracts require strategic actions aligned with FSM.
    2. Environments which do not let the women survive without procreative contracts require provisional resource maximization.

What is a sexual strategy which optimizes for provisional sexual coercion (psc)?

A man who pursues procreation via PSC must offer a procreative contract to women who exchange procreative sex for resources.

The strategy is optimized by optimizing each action.

You must exist in a specialized environment (i.e. psc environment) for a procreative contract to be fully performed.

  1. You must exist in an environment which

    1. recognizes,
    2. enforces,
    3. and assigns consequences to the breach of
      procreative contracts.

  2. You must exist in an environment where women chose to have sex during ovulation in exchange for resources.

You must offer women procreative contracts.

  1. You must approach the woman with a contract containing terms which include the act of procreation between you and the woman.
  2. You and the woman must fully execute (i.e. sign) the contract.
  3. You and the woman must fully perform (i.e. complete) the contract.

1. You must exist in a provisionally-sexual coercive environment.

Why must your environment recognize, enforce, and assign consequences to the breach of procreative contracts?

Your environment must recognize, enforce (e.g., spiritually, culturally, or legally), and assign consequences to the breach of procreative contracts because women default to behavior aligned with Female Sexual Mate Selection (FSM).

Here are the logical deductions for the assertion that "women default to behavior aligned with Female Sexual Mate Selection (FSM)".

  1. The Fertility Transition and Economic Independence Hypothesis is proven by demographic data which shows that divorce rates rise as women gain access to higher education, independent wages, and state-backed social safety nets, rates of procreative contracts (i.e. marriage rates) lower and rates of procreative contract breaches (i.e. divorce rates rise) [4, 13]. Women reject low-value provisional contracts and exercise FSM, prioritizing visual, genetic, and immediate chemical attraction over historical wealth markers when resource dependency is removed [4, 13].
  2. SwitchUpCB's Worldview ("You are human") uses scientific studies and a logical extrapolation based on the same statements asserted by fundamentals to share stories which demonstrate how human biology and reproductive imperatives default to FSM when coercion is not used.
    1. The Hunter-Gatherer story shows human behavior aligned with FSM.
    2. The Agricultural Community story shows a technological shift resulting in institutionalized resource provisioning which gave men the power to implement PSC.
    3. The Industrial City and Megacity stories show how financial autonomy among women results in woman defaulting to behaviors aligned with FSM.
  3. Human sexual attraction is a feeling used to select a human mate for sex.
    1. fundamentals asserts human behavior is influenced by reproduction.
    2. Human emotion (e.g., feelings of sexual attraction) is human behavior.
    3. So, human sexual attraction is influenced by reproduction.
    4. ... Unfinished, needs editing
    5. This emotion is not changed by contracts (e.g., marriage) or resources (e.g., money) in the context of procreation.
      1. For example, an old man or women does not become more sexually attractive with resources [ insert source even if its obvious ].
      2. For example, a person can use resources to buy items (e.g., food, makeup) which make them more sexually attractive. However, the resources themselves did not make the person more sexually attractive.
    6. So, this assertion shows how human behavior aligns with FSM.

Why must your environment include women who chose to have sex during ovulation in exchange for resources?

Your environment must include women who choose to have sex during or near ovulation in exchange for resources because

  1. a woman must have sex during or near ovulation to get pregnant*.
  2. a woman must agree to the exchange of sex for resources to enter a valid procreative contract.

*Modern technology lets women terminate pregnancies at various stages, but this resource assumes the woman has agreed to procreate in a procreative contract.

What makes a woman choose to have procreative sex in exchange for resources?

A woman chooses to have procreative sex in exchange for resources for various reasons with the most popular reason being to acquire resources required for her survival [ source required ].

However, a psc environment is not solely defined as an environment where a woman must have procreative sex in exchange resources to survive.

Here is the science.

Cross-cultural anthropological data proves that female economic independence collapsed (7, 11) as human societies transitioned from egalitarian foraging to resource-hoarding agricultural systems.

Female mating strategies naturally shift away from pure genetic preferences (FSM) and default entirely to resource-security alliances (PSC) (7, 8) When legal, religious, or state institutions restrict a woman's ability to own land, work, or inherit capital.

Here is an analogy.**

Suppose a town exists with multiple grocery stores.

  1. The owners charge exorbitant prices and people who cannot grow their own food pay because the people do not choose to grow their own food or leave the town.
  2. Then, the owners lobby local politicians to make a law which makes it illegal for people to grow their own food.

Later, a local food bank opens and distributes food without any client verification requirements. So, anyone can get free food.

  1. The owners can no longer use a person's food dependency to exert power over the town.
  2. Customers only walk into grocery stores when they want to buy from the store.

Here is a comparison of a realistic environment and the analogy.

A woman in an environment which does not let her own resources must find a man to provide her with resources to survive.

  1. Historically, spiritual (i.e. religious) or legal (i.e. government-enforced) conventions mandated that the exchange
    1. included exclusive, lifetime procreative sex between the man and the woman.
    2. included exclusive, lifetime provisional commitment to the woman from the man.
  2. Historically, spiritual or legal conventions mandated that
    1. women cannot work or own property.

Here is the relation of each real term to an analogous term.

2. You must offer women procreative contracts.

Why must you offer women procreative contracts?

You must offer the woman the procreative contract because otherwise she won't have procreative sex with you.

  1. Your terms of the contract must include procreative sex — in the context of PSC — and consideration for both parties is recommended as it exists in modern contract law.
  2. You must fully execute the contract with the woman.
  3. You and the woman must perform the terms of the contract to be fully performed.

Which women do you approach?

You approach women by operating in alignment with the conventions of your psc environment.

Where do you approach women?

Suppose the psc environment lets women choose the man and work for resources.

Then, you should approach women in an environment with a relatively high volume of women who are receptive to procreative contracts.

Here is why.

A woman signs the procreative contract with a man who

  1. she is sexually attracted to in this psc environment.
  2. offers her the most value in psc environments which require procreative contracts to include non-competitive terms (i.e. exclusivity).

So, you should approach multiple women to maximize the chance of finding a woman who is sexually attracted to you (as explained in FSM).

Then, you must offer her the most value amongst her other considered offers (which come from other men who are sexually attracted to her that she is sexually attracted to).

Here is the science.

The Dual-Mating Strategy and Bi-Strategic Investment Perspective are proven by empirical data which shows that women place a hyper-priority on resource extraction, social status, and upward mobility in cultures where women choose long-term monogamous contracts (4). Long-term contractual mating forces a structural trade-off where economic capability can offset minor physical deficiencies while short-term mating values pure aesthetics (4).

Here is analogy.

A company hiring a long-term security firm doesn't hire a firm which looks untrustworthy or incompetent (The FSM baseline).

Instead, the company chooses from the trustworthy and competent firm which offers the most advanced equipment, the best insurance, and the highest level of resource backing.

Suppose the psc environment lets women choose the man, but not own resources.

An environment which lets women choose the man but not own resources requires the woman to choose a man even when there exists no sexually attractive men (from her perspective).

So, you execute a procreative contract with this woman by offering her the most provisional value amongst her other considered offers (which come from other men who are sexually attracted to her).

This procreative contract is — from her perspective — her job (even when she does not like the terms of employment): She is a sex worker.

Here is an analogy.

Suppose there is a town with a factory.

You choose to

  1. walk in the factory,
  2. sign an employment contract,
  3. and perform the terms of the contract.

So, your consent is legally binding even when

You chose the terms of the employment contract with the factory over alternative options.

You were not physically forced to work in the factory because using physical force is illegal.

Here is the science.

Constrained optimization under duress is a foundational tenet of behavioral economics where legal consent is distinct from intrinsic sexual preference in evolutionary models of mate choice. (4). Human decision-making systems routinely execute consensual contracts that maximize immediate material survival for the individual and their kin, which directly override their underlying evolutionary desires for idealized genetic matches when environmental pressures are high (4, 8).

What are examples of psc environments?

e.g., Reproductive Dominance among Chieftains and Leaders

Intrasexual coalition dominance models prove that institutional leadership combined with absolute resource gatekeeping maximizes reproduction by entirely bypassing free female choice and replacing it with systemic, structurally consensual provisional leverage (4, 11). High-resolution Y-chromosome genetic registries show massive, continent-wide reproductive expansions tied directly to powerful ruling despots (4, 11).

Historically, political leaders, tribal chieftains, and dominant elites have the highest number of biological offspring on average. They maximize their sexual reproduction by entirely bypassing free female choice and replacing it with systemic, structurally consensual provisional leverage (4, 11).

This trend is explained by provisional dominance in the context of PSC: A man who controls all the resources can execute a higher volume and quality of procreative contracts.

Here is the example.

A leader uses a coalition of force to monopolize local resources, control territory, and dictate the legal and spiritual laws of the community. he structures the environment so that women must enter his lineage to secure protection and status, while simultaneously using force to eliminate or trespass rival males from the mating pool by establishing an absolute monopoly over survival assets.

e.g., Marriage as defined by Christianity

  1. You are familiar with this strategy when you believe in any religion which uses the contractual concept of marriage (e.g., Christianity).
    ...

  2. Any woman who chooses monogamous relationships (e.g., whereby she does not "date" other men when she has a boyfriend) is also likely to be operating (by choice) in alignment with this strategy.

e.g., "Money gets girls"

  1. which is why certain men say 'money' get girls is simply that these men are in environments which allow psc and exist in a market where fsm does not matter

Sources Used

outdated.

Enter your search text in the box above

Select a result to preview